Beneath the skin

I have read the book Beneath the skin by Nicci French and it is a chilling read to say the least. The story is about three women, Zoë, Jennifer and Nadia that have nothing in common. Except for the man that wants to kill them. He sends them terrifying letters where he writes down very intimate details of their lives- the clothes they wear, their little habits, how they act when they think they are alone, things he would not know if he had not been studying them for a long time and from a very close distance.

 

I think that this book plays with our fear of being watched by someone unknown. That there are someone out there that wants to harm us and that he is just getting closer and closer without us knowing and without us being able to do anything about it. I hate those kinds of thoughts as I easily get paranoid and start to imagine things that are not there. Not very healthy in the long run.

 

“Women. In the summer, I watch them, I smell them, and I remember them. They look at their reflections in shop windows, sucking in their stomachs, standing straighter, and I look at them. I watch them watching themselves. I see them when they think they are invisible.” Page 1.

 

I get the creeps by this person and his behavior, and it is not revealed until near the end of the book who he is so I, just like the women in the book, starts to distrust everyone around them. I reflect upon every word and every action, just like Zoë, Jennifer and Nadia, just to try to find out who the person that sends the creepy letters is. And the mistake that these girls do is that they start to trust no one, with the result that they end up alone. It is a sad, and in two cases fatal, result, but I can understand it. If you do not know who to trust, then it might be easier to just trust no one.

 

It is disturbing to read about how the man slowly breaks the women down and how they can not even feel secure in their own homes and with their own family and friends. If there is one place that you should be able to rest and feel secure, it should be in your own home, and this man takes that away from them.

 

Even if you skip the part where the man says he is going to kill them, it is still disturbing that he is watching them and noticing things that you normally would want to keep to yourself. The small habits that you are a bit ashamed of or embarrassed about and that you do not want anyone else to know about. What if someone is watching me right now? What if someone is following me every day, noticing and remembering my actions, my habits and every other part of my life..?

 

“Dear Zoë, When does someone like you, young and pretty and healthy, become frightened of dying? I wonder. You smoke (there’s a nicotine stain on your finger by the way). Sometimes you take drugs. You eat bad food. You stay up late and the next morning you don’t get hangovers. Probably you think that you will live for ever, that you will be young for a long time yet.

Zoë, with your white teeth and your one small dimple when you smile, you will not be young for much longer. You have been warned.

Are you scared, Zoë? I am watching you. I am not going to go away.” Page 35.


The story of Stuff

I have watched the educational film The story of Stuff with Annie Leonard and even though it has a very serious message to deliver, I still can't help but to smile. Annie addresses the matter in a very entertaining way and you'll enjoy all the small figures and cartoons that'll fill your screen.

Annie and her cartoon figures show us how the production system and the materials economy works, from extraction of materials through production, distribution and consumption to the final disposal of the remaining trash. And we're talking about a whole lot of trash. In the US they've looked into it and they discovered that within six months from the day of consumption 99% of all the bought stuff have ended up in the trash, which leaves the inexpressible small amount of 1% remaining in the household.

 

I don’t think that we throw away the same amount here in Sweden, at least not in that short period of time, because I just can’t think of that many products that you discard so easily and so fast. Ok; food, plastic bags, paper and all those kind of consumer goods, but what about clothes, furniture, electronics, paintings, carpets, cars and all that kind of stuff, that you’ll keep for a while right? At least more than six months? But then, for example when it comes to the electronics you might be caught in the perceived obsolescence, which simply means that you want to buy new products even though your old ones are still functional. I can easily observe this when I look at my little sister. Last time I was home she had a new mobile phone and this makes it her fifth one. I’m still on my second and I’m eight years older than her and have had mine way longer. Whilst she wants to be popular and therefore "have to have" the latest phone, I’m pretty satisfied with the one I bought two years ago. I can also observe this in my boyfriend whose biggest desire at the moment is a larger TV, preferably with HD and all those other new functions that you just must have, even though we already have nice flat screen that works just fine. But at least he realizes that he have to wait with that new one until he’s got a job.

What disturbs me the most in the film is still the planned obsolescence that exist, the fact that companies design their products so that they’ll break after a certain period of time. I’m studying to become an Innovation and Design engineer, and this way of thinking troubles me since I want to design things that’ll pretty much last forever. I don’t want my products and designs to have any flaws, and certainly not designed flaws at that. I think that the idea of planned obsolescence is wrong, and that it’s the same as fraud. You’re making the consumers buy products with poor quality even though you say that it is the best in the market, which is just wrong no matter how you look at it.


And concerning the environmental message in the film... I have never really cared about the environment, probably because I just couldn't see how the fact that I threw my garbage in the right can could possibly make a difference in the world. And I think that the big problem here is that most people think just like that, what they do just doesn't matter. And not to forget, we also have the problem with stubbornness, the "if he won't then I won't"-idea. But that won’t work; we all have to lend a helping hand if we want to change how things are going. I won’t tell you to stop using your car ‘cause let’s face it, you won’t, but maybe you could try to buy near-produced food to avoid unnecessary food transports, throw your bottle in the recycle bin so that it can be used again and keep that mobile phone of yours six months longer than planned. Then, if everyone actually joined in, maybe we could see a change.

Assignment 1 - Snooping bosses

Ok, so I've just read the article Snooping bosses by Kristina Dell and Lisa Takeuchi Cullen, an article about how employers monitor their employees, not only during their working hours but also at home, and I'm now supposed to analyze it and express my feelings in the matter. But the fact is that I don't really know what to think. When I consider all the aspects and listen to both sides I still can't decide which one I think is right in this matter.

When I think that my employer is watching and monitoring me when I work I get upset, but why should I? I'm (usually...) not doing anything wrong when I'm working, so why can't he/she watch me? Maybe because I just don't like the feeling. I wouldn't like it if someone was standing behind me, watching me either. Perhaps it's because I don't like the feeling that he/she isn't trusting me to do my job even if I have never slipped before.
But say, if I WAS doing something wrong, and now I don't really mean anything illegal but more like visiting webpages I shouldn't while I'm supposed to work, then shouldn't my boss have the right to know this? Since he/she is the one paying me to sit there, shouldn't he/she be the one to decide what I'm to do with the time? And if I'm doing something that I shouldn't, then shouldn't he/she have the right to fire me?

But even I like to surf the web from time to time, and if I'm on break or have finished all my work for the time being, then I don't really see the wrong in doing so. I think that five minutes on Facebook may make me more efficient the rest of the time since I got it out of the system. I think people will be able to concentrate better if they're allowed to take small breaks every now and then, and if I want to surf on my break, then why not? But the employer should be able to see which pages I have visited and how much time I have spent there, so they know that people isn't just slacking.

So I think it's all right to monitor the employees to a certain degree while they're at work, but they should never be allowed to monitor people at home. They have nothing to do with what I'm doing at home, after working hours. If I'm doing something illegal, then it's up to the police to do something about it. Yeah, sure, it would be easyer to find the bad guys, like childmolesters, murderers and so on if we were all constantly supervised, but at what cost? I sure wouldn't want someone to be watching my every step every single day. I'd become paranoid.
And I mean, don't we all do things that we probably shouldn't sometimes? Like downloading our favorite music or movies (how many really stopped when that law came?) or lie about our age just to get the cheapest ticket for the bus? Or ignore those constant letters from Radiotjänst, asking you if you have a TV or not? Or even cross the street even though it's a red light?

And the fact that possible future employers nowadays Google every candidate for the job before hiring them really freaks me out. Not that I really have some pictures or texts on the net that I wouldn't want a future employer to see, but then I don't really know what they are looking for or what they actually interprets in my texts. If I write that I for example totally partyed my ass off on Saturday and that I was oh so hungover on Sunday, then they may think that this mean that I'm not so reliable when it comes to work, even though they have absolutely nothing to do with each other...
That last one may be a bit off-topic, but still, it's about supervising people, and I just don't like it. It may be necessary sometimes, but I still just don't like it.

Welcome I guess...

I actually already have a blog, but since I don't really want to write the assignments on that one, I guess I have to start a new one. ;) But I still feel comfortable on this domain where I know how to write and publish everything so I'll stay here instead of starting over elsewhere. And sorry about the design, I'll try to do something about that later...

RSS 2.0